This Week in Tariff Madness™: Spider Mites & War Risk Surcharges
This weekend started with a different kind of investigation.
Not tariffs.
Spider mites.
Over the past few weeks, I’ve been nursing several of my houseplants back to health after discovering what can only be described as a spite mite situation.
If you’ve ever dealt with spider mites before, you know they are tiny, persistent, and incredibly good at quietly creating chaos.
The primary victim in my home has been my cordyline plant; it took the brunt of the infestation. That one required the full intervention; wiping down leaves, rinsing, treatment sprays, and a little patience.
During the process I inspected the rest of the plant family.
My bird of paradise showed signs of a past spider mite infestation; the telltale stippling on the leaves; but thankfully nothing active.
And my fiddle leaf figs?
Looking strong. Completely unaffected. Standing tall like they knew better than to get involved in that mess.

But the whole experience reminded me of something we’re seeing right now in global trade.
Sometimes disruption starts quietly.
You don’t always notice the issue right away; until suddenly everyone realizes something has been spreading in the background.
Which brings us to tariffs.
A Quick Flashback to ICPA
Two weeks ago I was in San Antonio for the International Compliance Professionals Association (ICPA) conference; which is essentially where the people who read the Federal Register for fun gather to compare notes.
Importers. Brokers. Trade attorneys. Compliance leaders. Consultants. Government officials.
In other words; the people who end up explaining trade policy to the rest of the business.
The final afternoon session had one of the most memorable visuals of the entire conference.
The session was titled “Managing Supply Chain Risk: Lessons from Playing with Fire,” presented by Kelsey Moraski; Director, Global Warehousing, Logistics and Compliance at IMI Plc.

And yes; the session included an actual fire eater demonstration.
Because apparently the best way to illustrate supply chain risk is to literally show someone playing with fire.
The metaphor landed perfectly.
Because if there’s one thing the trade compliance community has gotten very good at lately; it’s standing very close to something that could burn us while calmly managing the risk.

The IEEPA Refund Conversation
One of the biggest topics circulating through the conference; and continuing in the weeks since; is the fallout from the Supreme Court ruling striking down the IEEPA tariffs.
On paper, the decision was clear.
In practice?
The refund process is still developing.
Right now companies across industries are trying to determine several things:
How refunds will actually be processed through CBP systems
Whether refunds will be automatic or require importer action
Whether protests, PSCs, or other claims will be necessary
How long refunds may take to move through the pipeline
In other words;
The legal decision came quickly.
The operational mechanics are still catching up.
The Refund Positioning Game
While the refund process is still evolving; companies are already positioning themselves strategically.
Because refund eligibility may ultimately depend on documentation and timing.
Which means smart trade teams right now are:
Preserving entry data tied to IEEPA tariffs
Confirming who ultimately bore the duty burden
Monitoring CBP guidance and litigation developments
Evaluating whether protective claims may make sense
The companies that benefit the most from refunds likely won’t be the ones reacting later.
They’ll be the ones who started preparing early.
Meanwhile… Shipping Just Got More Interesting
As if tariff volatility wasn’t enough; another issue is starting to ripple through global supply chains.
The security situation around the Strait of Hormuz has raised concerns across the shipping and insurance industries.
The Strait of Hormuz is one of the most critical maritime chokepoints in the world; with a large portion of global energy shipments moving through that corridor.
When instability rises in that region; carriers and insurers reassess risk very quickly.
And we’re already seeing the operational impact.
Several carriers are now adding war risk surcharges or adjusting pricing structures to reflect heightened security concerns in the region.
For importers and exporters; that means yet another variable entering the landed cost equation.
Tariffs are only one part of the story.
Freight risk can shift just as quickly.
The Spider Mite Lesson
Spider mites rarely announce themselves.
They start small. Quiet. Hard to detect.
And if you don’t catch them early; they spread.
Trade disruption works in a similar way.
It might begin with a tariff action.
Or a court ruling.
Or geopolitical tensions affecting a key shipping route.
But over time those developments compound into very real operational challenges.
The companies navigating this environment successfully are the ones who are:
Monitoring policy signals early
Maintaining strong compliance documentation
Modeling tariff and logistics scenarios
Preparing for multiple regulatory outcomes
Because in this environment; waiting for certainty isn’t realistic.
Preparation is.
And On That Note…
Two weeks later; I’m still thinking about that “playing with fire” session in San Antonio.
Because honestly; it may be the most accurate metaphor for supply chain management right now.
A lot of us are operating in environments where the flames are real; but the work still has to get done.
Meanwhile at home; the cordyline is recovering, the bird of paradise seems stable, and the fiddle leaf figs remain blissfully unbothered.
If only tariff policy could stabilize that quickly.
The spider mites are under control.
The tariffs?
Still very much a work in progress.
✍🏽 Follow me for weekly, snark-infused global trade insights. Got USMCA, customs, or tariff questions? DM or email: beuloria@thetradewhisperer.com
Comments
Comments settings
Like
Comment
Share
Add a comment…
Open Emoji Keyboard
No comments, yet.
Be the first to comment.
Start the conversation
.png)
du doan xsmb đang nói tới mốc ngày 3 9 2026 nên mình ghé xem thử cách họ trình bày thôi, không phải kiểu vào là bị ngợp chữ ngay; tiêu đề “Soi cầu MB ngày 3 9 2026” để lớn, nhìn phát biết đúng bài theo ngày, khỏi phải lục nhiều, kéo xuống là thấy phần dự đoán XSMB hôm nay được chia thành mấy khối ngắn, mỗi khối tách ý rõ nên đọc lướt cũng nắm được; mình hay xem trên điện thoại nên đánh giá cao chỗ họ không nhồi quá nhiều đoạn dài liền tù tì, cảm giác đỡ mỏi mắt; nói chung nếu chỉ cần xem nhanh cho đúng ngày thì ổn, vì mấy heading…
kèo nhà cái mình thấy bạn bè nhắc suốt nên cũng bấm vào nghía thử cho biết. Mình không đọc kỹ nội dung đâu, chỉ lướt qua xem trang họ làm có dễ nhìn không. Ấn tượng ban đầu là giao diện khá sáng sủa, khoảng cách giữa các phần vừa đủ nên kéo xuống không bị rối. Mấy khối thông tin được chia tách rõ ràng, nhìn cái là biết đang ở đoạn nào chứ không bị dính chùm vào nhau. Mình cũng để ý thanh menu đặt ngay chỗ dễ thấy nên đổi qua lại mấy mục khá nhanh, không phải mò mẫm. Nói chung kiểu trình bày gọn gàng, nhất là cách họ để menu điều hướng…
Bài viết rất dễ theo dõi, ví dụ sát thực tế nên mình thấy hữu ích, cảm ơn bạn đã chia sẻ. Dạo này mình cũng hay theo dõi các nền tảng giải trí trực tuyến để học cách họ chia mục và trình bày thông tin. Mình có làm một trang riêng để gom ghi chú và link hay dùng, tiện lưu lại và tra cứu khi cần. Ai quan tâm có thể ghé xem tại https://www.myminifactory.com/users/tranlan
Mình xem xổ số kiểu cho vui là chính, coi như thêm chút giải trí chứ không đặt nặng chuyện trúng hay không. Trước đây nghe người ta bàn về mấy “cầu” này nọ, mình cũng nửa tin nửa ngờ, nhưng theo dõi một thời gian thì đôi lúc thấy có vài dạng lặp lại nên cũng tò mò. Mỗi khi đọc nhận định của ai đó, mình thường ghi lại vài ý ngắn gọn rồi sau đó so kết quả, để khỏi bị cảm giác kiểu “biết trước rồi”. Có hôm trúng được chút thì vui thật, nhưng cũng nhiều lần sai bét nên mình tự nhắc là đừng tin tuyệt đối. Thỉnh thoảng mình lướt cho có chuyện…